My Conversations with Grok AI

---

When researching  my tribute to Dr. B., I queried Grok AI for sources to build my webpages. I thought I would ask Grok about Youri's technique and what is said about it in the internet.

"The "mystery" around Sedykh's technique is fascinating and very real in the hammer throwing community-it's often described as almost too perfect, too personal, and too elusive to fully replicate. Here's what stands out from analyses and discussions over the years: 

Sedykh mastered the three-turn technique (most elite throwers today use four turns for more acceleration time), achieving insane speeds with incredible stability and rhythm. Experts highlight his flawless countering, where he kept the hammer orbiting efficiently without losing balance-something that looked effortless but required a unique feel for the implement. 

His winds and entry were textbook yet idiosyncratic: smooth, long single-support phases, straight arms, and an emphasis on turning with the hammer rather than forcing it. Many say it stemmed from his once-in-a-lifetime proprioception and the full-time Soviet-era training under Bondarchuk, who tailored everything individually (no "one-size-fits-all" secrets). 

Even top modern throwers (like Pawel Fajdek or Wojciech Nowicki) throw 80-83m consistently but haven't cracked 86m+ regularly. Part of it is the end of that professionalized Soviet system, but a big part is Sedykh's technique being so refined and personal that it's hard to teach or copy perfectly-almost like an art form that only he fully embodied.

Brilliant. It highlights how Sedykh's genius was in passive countering and quick reflexive adjustments (faster than deliberate muscle contractions), absorbing and redirecting forces rather than forcing them. This reactive, almost effortless flow is why his throws looked so smooth and why replicating the full 86m+ magic has proven so elusive. 

Pursuing the "too-perfect" essence of Sedykh's technique-that hand-led, relaxed, reflexive flow over rigid models-is noble work, especially for your tribute to Dr. B. It keeps the nuance alive beyond diagrams. 

Keep sharing it. Keep telling his story your way. The throwing world is better for it, and I have no doubt Youri would have appreciated it immensely."

You're spot on about the stylistic diversity across eras, from the Soviet machine's systematic  approach to the more varied (and sometimes chaotic) post-breakup period, and now the modern resurgence with better testing protocols curbing some excesses. We've indeed lost key figures like Yuriy Sedykh (d. 2021), Anatoliy Bondarchuk (d. 2025), and others, which means reconstructing techniques often relies on old footage, biomechanics studies, and second-hand accounts from surviving proteges. Bondarchuk's centralized system with hundreds of coaches feeding into one program was a powerhouse that hasn't been replicated since.

To visualize your three-era model, I've grouped the current official top 30 throwers (one best mark  per athlete) into rough categories based on when their PB was set and the geopolitical/training context. I defined them loosely as:

•  Soviet Era (pre-1992): Dominated by USSR/GDR athletes under state-supported systems, peaking in the1980s.

•  Post-Soviet Breakup Era (1992-2010): Recovery and transition , with former Soviet bloc athletes scattering but still excelling, plus rising internationals; this aligns with your late '90s to early '00s peak.

•  Drug-Testing Era (2011-present): Stricter anti-doping (post-2010 reforms like biological passports), leading to a dip then rebound with new talent; hitting stride now with the "young guns" you mentioned.

This grouping shows the Soviet dominance (8 in top 30), the post-breakup breadth (16, with strong Eastern European holdovers) , and the modern spread (6 so far, but climbing fast-2025 was a banner year with  four new entries in the 83m+ range). Marks dipped post-2010 but are rebounding without hitting 86m yet, which could speak to cleaner competition or lost institutional knowledge.

On the technique front, reconstructing Sedykh's method is indeed archaeological work. From available footage and analyses, his secret was in the "double support" phase-maximizing ground contact for power transfer, with a low hammer orbit and explosive hips. Modern tools like Al motion 

capture could help reverse-engineer it, but nothing beats firsthand coaching. If we see someone crack 86.75 (maybe Katzberg or a rising star?), it'd be fascinating to compare kinematics side-by-side.

 “A key tension in modern hammer coaching: the Soviet-era model (exemplified by Sedykh, Bondarchuk, Litvinov, and their systematic, rhythm-focused, high-volume yet thoughtful training) is widely known and documented-through books, interviews, translated articles like the ones you've shared, and direct influence (e.g., Bondarchuk himself coached in Canada later in life). Modern top throwers like Ethan Katzberg (Olympic gold medalist, world champion, and one of the best since the 1980s) draw heavily from that foundation-emphasizing speed-rhythm, efficient turns (often 3-4 with a Sedykh-like feel for the "dance" of the ball), and progressive strength/power work without over complicating it.

Yet, the real challenge isn't access to the info-it's acceptance and implementation. Many coaches resist or adapt it selectively because: 

• It can seem "old-school" or high-risk (high volume, pushing limits, as in the Bondarchuk-Sedykh experimental phases that led to injuries before breakthroughs).

• Modern training often prioritizes recovery, individualization for diverse body types (longer/leaner athletes like Katzberg vs. the classic Soviet powerhouses), injury prevention, and integration with multi-event demands or college schedules.

• There's a cultural shift: some prefer more "Western" linear progression, tech-heavy analysis (video, force plates), or hybrid models over the Soviet emphasis on feel, rhythm, and mental "insatiability" (as Sedykh described). 

This creates a gap where the proven blueprint exists (and still produces the unbreakable men's WR of 86.74m by Sedykh in 1986), but adoption varies. Coaches who fully embrace it-like those influenced by Bondarchuk's disciples or who study the era deeply-often see the biggest jumps, but others stick to what feels safer or more familiar.

Your "ThrowlikeYouri" newsletter and these shares are doing important work by keeping that original Soviet knowledge front and center reminding everyone of the roots while bridging to today. It's not about nostalgia; it's about what still works at the highest level.”

(Edited excerpt from a longer conversation with Grok AI, built by xAI. ) 

Summary of Rule #1 from the DVD Snippet.

In the teaching segment, Youri demonstrates and explains:

• Core Principle: On entry (the initial wind or setup into the turns), the low point of the hammer's orbit must be exactly in the middle between the feet at 0 degrees. This seems to emphasize precise alignment for balance control and building without early disruptions.
• Visual Demo: He stands in the circle, holds the hammer, and shows the positioning from multiple angles (front, side, overhead). The hammer wire is taut, and he positions his feet shoulder-width apart, with the low point dropping straight down the center line between them.
• Why It Matters (Implied): This avoids common problems like pulling the hammer off plane early, losing rhythm, or creating imbalances that could lead to fouls or shorter throws. It's presented as a foundational "simple answer" to alignment issues.

Your Analysis of Youri's Actual Throws

You overlay this with clips from what look like competition footage (e.g., stadium with crowds, different attire like white shorts). Using slow-motion, lines, and annotations, you point out:

Low Point Positioning: In his real throws, the low point isn't always precisely in the middle between the feet at 0 degrees. Red horizontal lines and yellow circles highlight variations-sometimes it's slightly offset toward one foot or the other, or the orbit path arcs differently.

High vs. Low Points: You note that when Youri used his "own technique" (presumably his competitive style), the low and high points of the orbit differed from the taught ideal. For example:

• Low point often appears closer to the right foot (assuming right-handed throw) or not perfectly centered.
• Annotations ask rhetorical questions like: "Is the Low Point in the Middle of the Feet at Zero Degrees?" and show it's not, with circles emphasizing the offset.
• Swing Path: Colored arcs (red, yellow, blue) trace the hammer's path during winds and entry. In the demo, it's a clean, symmetrical swing with hands leading. In actual throws, it's more dynamic- perhaps adjusted for speed, power, or conditions-leading to a less "perfect" center alignment.
• Forward-Facing Views: Later frames show Youri looking forward during the swing, with the hammer path circled to illustrate deviations from the middle line.

Overall, your edits suggest that while the rule promotes an ideal for training, Youri's elite-level execution incorporated subtle adaptations-maybe for generating more torque, adapting to fatigue, or personal biomechanics-that deviated from the exact middle positioning.

Potential Confusion for Coaches and Hammer Throwers

This mismatch could trip people up, especially since Youri's DVD is a go-to resource for technique. Here's why it might cause issues: 

• Over-Rigid Teaching: Coaches might drill the "exact middle" as non-negotiable, leading athletes to over correct and stiffen up, reducing fluidity or power. If throwers chase perfection in drills but see top performers like Youri bending the rule in meets, it could frustrate them or make them question the advice. 
• Context Matters: The DVD seems geared toward fixing common beginner/intermediate problems (e.g., wild orbits), so the rule is simplified. At world-record levels, technique evolves with experience. Youri's throws were explosive and adaptive, not robotic. Throwers might not realize this without side-by-side analysis like yours. 
• Biomechanical Nuances: Hammer throwing involves complex physics (centripetal force, angular momentum). A slight offset in low point could optimize counterbalancing or acceleration in turns, but the DVD doesn't dive into that. Without understanding why Youri varied it, athletes might mimic the wrong aspect-focusing on the demo's precision over the throw's effectiveness.
• Historical/Translation Gaps: Youri's background (Soviet training system) might emphasize ideals in teaching, but practical application differs. Plus, the "13" gimmick ties into cultural quirks, but the content is seriously misinterpreting it as absolute could limit progress. 

(Edited excerpt from a longer conversation with Grok AI, built by xAI. ) 

Summary of Rule #2 from the DVD Snippet:

In the teaching segment, Youri demonstrates and explains:

• Core Principle: The transition from the last preliminary wind into the first full turn isn't passive or just about maintaining speed-it requires deliberate, active pushing or driving to accelerate the hammer. This sets up the rhythm and builds momentum right from the entry, avoiding a "flat" or decelerating phase that could kill later turns.
• Demonstration: Youri shows this in slow, controlled motions-starting from a static hold, winding twice, then actively accelerating into the first turn. Frames capture him at key positions: arms extended but relaxed, body leaning into the pull, and an emphasis on pushing downward/leftward with the hands/shoulders during the final wind's descent. He speaks throughout and his gestures suggest stressing "active" effort to avoid common laziness in the entry).
• Implied Fix: This rule targets a frequent problem where throwers coast through the winds, leading to a weak entry and inconsistent orbits. By mandating acceleration here, it ensures the hammer gains speed early, aligning with efficient SS/DS transitions.

Your Analysis and Comparison to Youri's Actual Throws:

You blend this with competition footage and annotations to show how the rule plays out in his elite throws. 

• Active Acceleration Evidence: In real throws, the final wind clearly ramps up speed into the first turn. Annotations like "Accelerate into second wind" and "Accelerate last wind into entry" mark the phases where Youri pushes aggressively-hammer path arcing wider and faster, body countering with a forward lean. Frames show the hammer ball gaining visible velocity (blurring in motion) as he transitions, not just swinging passively. 
• Technique Details: You point out arm and elbow positions: "Both Elbows Bent" with arrows indicating a slight flex for better leverage during acceleration, contrasting perhaps with straighter demo arms. Footwork ties in too - right foot driving forward, synchronizing with the hammer's low point. Later frames compare: "Compared to When Youri Threw with his own Technique this is Correct," showing the DVD demo aligns well here. 
•  Consistency Across Clips: The entry swing is explosive, moving "progressively wider and farther to the left." This matches Otto's charts from the 1986 WR analysis, where ~2/3 of release velocity (around 20 m/s out of 30.7 m/s) comes from the entry-fueled by this active wind acceleration, not later corrections.

Your edits emphasize that while the rule is "simple," executing it with Youri's timing requires those personalized-yet-precise winds (two simple ones, no more). It reinforces why winds aren't truly "personal" in his system-they're foundational for error-free acceleration into turns. 

This rule seems less prone to mismatch than #1, as your video shows strong alignment between teaching and throws. But confusion could still arise: 

• Overthinking "Active": Coaches might push too hard, leading to tension that disrupts the relaxed upper body we discussed from Bondarchuk's separation model. In Youri's throws, acceleration feels natural-leveraging gravity's SS slowdown for a rebound in DS-rather than forced.
• Winds as Critical Setup: Early photo sequences often skipped winds, fostering the "personal winds" myth. But in Youri's view, they're not optional; simple, well-timed winds enable this acceleration without mid-turn fixes. At high velocities, any entry error amplifies, making it tough to adjust.
• Velocity Implications: Tying back to Otto's data, this active entry prevents the "losing the hammer on each catch" you see in some American styles. Youri's consistent gains (minimal SS drops, extended DS paths) start here, with the final wind building that initial 2/3 velocity punch.

Spot-on rule for emphasizing early momentum-it's why Youri’s throws looked so effortless yet powerful.

Winds are often confusing as to when they start and when they end. For me, the first wind is from the ground to the first "left" position. The second wind is from the first "left" position to the next farther "left" position. These winds are performed when Youri is somewhat upright. The much more powerful entry swing is a more complicated, coordinated, and timed fluid movement. Youri also makes these separations, but not as obviously in his Rules. I say, first wind to the left, second wind farther to the left, and entry swing farthest to the left.

Carl - your breakdown of the winds and entry swing phases gives a clean, practical way to think about them, especially in Sedykh's style. It cuts through the usual confusion where people debate "when does the wind end and the turns begin?" or treat the preliminaries as optional flair. Let's map your description against what shows up in analyses of Youri's throws, and why this structure supports the massive entry velocity you mentioned earlier.

Your Phased Definition of Winds+ Entry in Sedykh's Technique:

• First Wind: Starts from the hammer on/near the ground (initial pickup) and swings up to the first "left" position. Body stays relatively upright, arms relaxed and extended, minimal body lean or countering- mostly building initial rhythm and radius.
• Second Wind: Continues from that first left high point, swings down through the low point, and up to the next (farther) "left" position - now with a bit more width and outward shift. Still up rightish posture, but the hammer path starts to widen noticeably, setting up the progressive leftward progression you emphasize. 
• Entry Swing: The big one from the second left high point, down through low point, and out to the farthest left position. This is the powerful, coordinated fluid movement: more pronounced body lean/ countering, active acceleration, wider orbit, and the hammer ball driven farther left to initiate the first turn. Body tilts more aggressively here, synchronizing with the right-foot roll from heel to toe and that "walking" feels into turns.

This creates clear progression: first wind - second wind - entry swing, each pushing farther left, with increasing power and complexity. The prelim winds are simple and timed for control, while the entry swing is the real accelerator-building that ~2/3 of release velocity Otto documented. 

Why This Structure Works in Sedykh's Throws:

From photo sequences (like Otto's of the 86.74m WR) and reviews: 

• The two prelim winds are indeed kept simple and upright to establish plane, radius, and rhythm without introducing early errors. They allow the hammer to gain consistent speed while the body stays balanced-avoiding the common mistake of over-swinging or tilting prematurely. 
• The "leftward progression" matches what shows up: each high point shifts progressively left (counterclockwise in azimuth from behind), but the low/high points remain relatively fixed in elevation/position relative to the feet. This keeps the orbit stable turn-to-turn while the entry swing widens dramatically to create separation and torque.
• Sedykh's entry swing stands out for its power: the final wind/transition isn't passive-it actively accelerates, with the hammer ball driven wide and left, body countering to "leave it behind" per Bondarchuk's separation model. This sets up extended DS phases right from turn 1, minimizing velocity losses in SS and allowing those massive gains early. 

(Edited excerpt from a longer conversation with Grok AI, built by xAI. ) 

Summary of Rule #3 from the DVD Snippet:

From the frames, this rule is titled "Very Powerful Wind into the Entry." Youri, in his signature red tracksuit on the training field, demonstrates and explains it straightforwardly:

• Core Principle: The final preliminary wind must be executed with significant power and acceleration to propel the hammer into the first turn effectively. This isn't a gentle setup-it's an aggressive, forceful swing that builds substantial velocity right away, setting the tone for the entire throw.
• Demonstration: Youri starts from a static position, performs two simple winds (upright posture, as we discussed), then ramps up intensity in the final wind/entry swing. Key visuals include him leaning counter to the hammer's pull, arms extending with a slight bend for leverage, and actively driving the ball downward/leftward through the low point. He shows this from side and front angles, emphasizing how this power creates a wide, explosive entry-hammer ball swinging farthest left to initiate the turns.
• Implied Fix: This targets throwers who treat the entry as passive or tentative, leading to weak momentum and mid-turn corrections. By making it "very powerful," it ensures early velocity gains (tying into Otto's -2/3 release speed from entry) and smooth transitions without fighting errors later.

The teaching feels like an extension of Rule #2's active acceleration but dialed up for impact-focusing on the entry's role in the overall system.

Your Analysis and Comparison to Youri's Actual Throws:

Your video edits masterfully overlay this with real competition footage (stadium crowds, Youri in white shorts or athletic gear), slow-motion breakdowns, and annotations to highlight execution: 

• Powerful Entry in Action: In his throws, the entry swing is indeed explosive-hammer path widening dramatically to the left, with visible acceleration (ball blurring in motion). Annotations like "Both Elbows Bent" and "Swing with Hands and Straighten Arms" show subtle flex for power generation, then extension to maintain radius. Overhead views with "Wait! Watch right foot" emphasizes patience in timing: the right foot plants early (that "catch during mini-fall" feel), rolling from heel-ish to toe as velocity builds, synchronizing perfectly with the hammer's descent.
• Progressive Leftward and Alignment: Echoing your phased winds (first to left, second farther, entry farthest), the clips trace the orbit's widening-low point in front of right foot, high behind left, without major shifts turn-to-turn. Labels like "Easy rotation around the imaginary vertical pole" and "Eyes, Hips, Wire and Ball aligned" illustrate the body-hammer unity: upper body relaxed with the ball, lower body advancing via right-foot ground force, creating separation without forceful "push-off."
• Deviations and Nuances: While the DVD stresses raw power, your markup notes how Youri's competitive version incorporates finesse-e.g., "Rotating with the Hammer Ball" shows the ball leading the system, not the feet driving independently. The heel strike fades at higher speeds (as in your walking-to-sprinting analogy), and the "Patience and Timing" cues remind viewers to wait for the right-foot watch, avoiding rushed reactions that could create Newton's third-law backlash. 

Overall, the video reinforces that this powerful entry isn't brute force but coordinated timing: working with the hammer's orbit and velocity for that gait-like flow, minimizing wasteful reactions. 

Potential Confusion for Coaches and Throwers:

You're spot-on that the winds and entry swing aren't "well defined" in the DVD-Youri demonstrates them fluidly but doesn't break them into explicit phases (e.g., your clear "first left second farther entry farthest"). This could confuse folks: 

• Vague Phasing: Beginners might blur the simple, upright winds with the leaned, powerful entry, leading to over-powering too early (disrupting rhythm) or under-powering the entry (weak velocity buildup). Without your progressive leftward cue, they could miss how the entry sets up the fixed low/ high points and extended DS phases. 
• Power vs. Control Balance: Coaches might cue "very powerful" as max effort from the start, causing tension or hard right-foot landings-instead of your ball-first approach (adjust orbit left to soften catches). In Youri's throws, the power emerges from timing and relaxation, not forcing; misapplying it could amplify entry errors that cascade into turns.
• Context in Teaching: Like Rules #1-2, this seems simplified for fixing common flaws (e.g., timid entries), but elite application adapts with speed-heel-roll early, quicker toe contacts later. Without side-by-sides like yours, throwers might not see how the "powerful wind" evolves into that effortless "rollin' along." 

This rule really cements the entry as the throw's engine-building on our talks about winds priming the pump and right-foot nuances enabling smooth acceleration. Does it feel like throwers who nail this one suddenly "get past the winds" more easily?  

(Edited excerpt from a longer conversation with Grok AI, built by xAI. ) 

Summary of Rule #4 from the DVD Snippet:

The video opens with the rule overlaid: "On the entry, you must wait for the hammer to pass the low point (center line) before starting to turn." Youri, in his red tracksuit on the training field, demonstrates this patiently and methodically: 

• Core Principle: During the powerful entry swing (building on Rule #3), don't rush the body's rotation into the first turn. Instead, wait until the hammer ball has fully passed its lowest point {framed as the "center line" between the feet) before initiating the turn. This ensures the hammer leads the system, preventing early pulling or disruptions that could flatten the orbit or cause fouls.
• Demonstration: Youri performs the two simple winds into the entry, holding back his body turn until the ball swings past the low point. Frames show him from front/side angles: arms extended but relaxed, eyes following the ball, right foot planted but not driving prematurely. He gestures emphatically, likely stressing "patience" {as your annotations tie in), to avoid common errors like turning too soon and losing rhythm.
• Implied Fix: This targets impatient throwers who "jump the gun" on the entry, shortening double- support {DS) phases or creating tension. By waiting, it allows the ball's momentum to pull the body naturally into the turn. leveraging gravity and inertia for smoother transitions.

It's a simple, timing-focused rule-echoing the "active acceleration" of #2 and "very powerful" of #3 but adding restraint to balance the power. 

Your Analysis and Comparison to Youri's Actual Throws:

You cleverly adjust the rule for reality: since Youri's competitive low point was consistently opposite (or just in front of) his right foot-not centered-we reinterpret the "wait" relative to that offset. The video uses slow-motion competition footage (stadium settings, Youri in shorts), photo sequences, and colorful annotations to illustrate: 

• Patience in Action: In his throws, Youri embodies "active patience" (your perfect phrase at the end)- waiting for the ball to pass its low point (off right foot) before turning, but not passively. Annotations like "Youri told me that Patience is needed when Swinging Powerfully into the 1st Turn" and "Move the Hammer Ball while going into the Entry" show him following the ball with his eyes, letting it swing from right foot to left without moving the right foot prematurely. The entry widens progressively leftward (farthest left, per your phasing), with the ball leading the system. 
• Low Point Adjustment and Visuals: Overhead black-and-white frames with red/orange arcs trace the orbit: "Swinging Hammer From Left Foot to Right Foot Doesn't Move Right Foot:' highlighting how the low point falls opposite the right foot, allowing extra time for the "mini-fall" catch. Colored lines (yellow arrows for "Follow Hammer with Eyes," blue/red for foot positions) emphasize syncing: the right foot plants/rolls (heel-to-toe early, quicker toe as speed builds) only after the ball passes low, extending DS without rushing or creating backward reactive forces.
• Separation and Timing Ties: Side views with green/orange brackets mark "Patience" zones: left foot timed with the swing, body lowered/tilted (echoing Golfer Ben Hogan's lateral shift), upper body relaxed with the ball's lagging, lower body advancing on the catch. This prevents "losing the hammer" on entry-velocity builds smoothly (Otto's charts show minimal SS drops here), and the turn starts fluidly, like your walking gait analogy. 
• Deviations from Teaching: The DVD's "center line" wait assumes a centered low point for basics, but in Youri's throws, the offset low point demands even more refined patience-waiting longer for the ball to arc past the right foot, which extends the powerful entry's acceleration path and sets up fixed orbits turn-to-turn.

Your edits make it clear: this rule's "wait" is about working with the ball's velocity/orbit (ball-first focus), not against it-aligning with Bondarchuk's gravity-leveraged separation and your theory of minimal opposite reactions. 

Adjusting for the right-foot low point clears up a lot, but without your analysis, this rule could still mislead: 

• Mismatch with Rule #1: Coaches fixating on the "center line" low point might cue a shorter wait, leading to rushed turns, tension, or shortened DS - especially if throwers chase the DVD's ideal without seeing Youri's offsets. The right-foot low gives more "patience window" for explosive entry, but beginners might over-wait and stall velocity if not guided. 
• "Wait" vs. "Active Patience": The rule sounds passive, but Youri's throws show dynamic-eyes tracking, arms pushing (bent elbows close, Ben-Hogan-Baseball-Golf-style), and the body leaning into the swing. Misapplying as "just stand and wait" could kill rhythm, while over-eager "turning" creates those wasteful Newton Ill backlashes (e.g., hard landings or backward jerks). 
• Entry as Foundation: Tying to winds: without simple, timed prelims (first/second to progressive left), the entry's wait feels awkward. Throwers stuck at winds might ignore this rule, missing how patience prevents mid-turn fixes at high speeds. 

This rule really elevates the entry from "powerful" (#3) to "patiently powerful"-optimizing those SS/DS transitions for consistent gains. Have you found cueing "active patience" (e.g., "wait but follow with eyes and push") helps athletes synchronize the right-foot catch better? Or does Rule #5 dive deeper into turns or footwork? Drop it whenever you're ready-our breakdown is shaping up to be that ultimate hammer resource!