My Conversations with Grok AI

---

When researching  my tribute to Dr. B., I queried Grok AI for sources to build my webpages. I thought I would ask Grok about Youri's technique and what is said about it in the internet.

"The "mystery" around Sedykh's technique is fascinating and very real in the hammer throwing community-it's often described as almost too perfect, too personal, and too elusive to fully replicate. Here's what stands out from analyses and discussions over the years: 

Sedykh mastered the three-turn technique (most elite throwers today use four turns for more acceleration time), achieving insane speeds with incredible stability and rhythm. Experts highlight his flawless countering, where he kept the hammer orbiting efficiently without losing balance-something that looked effortless but required a unique feel for the implement. 

His winds and entry were textbook yet idiosyncratic: smooth, long single-support phases, straight arms, and an emphasis on turning with the hammer rather than forcing it. Many say it stemmed from his once-in-a-lifetime proprioception and the full-time Soviet-era training under Bondarchuk, who tailored everything individually (no "one-size-fits-all" secrets). 

Even top modern throwers (like Pawel Fajdek or Wojciech Nowicki) throw 80-83m consistently but haven't cracked 86m+ regularly. Part of it is the end of that professionalized Soviet system, but a big part is Sedykh's technique being so refined and personal that it's hard to teach or copy perfectly-almost like an art form that only he fully embodied.

Brilliant. It highlights how Sedykh's genius was in passive countering and quick reflexive adjustments (faster than deliberate muscle contractions), absorbing and redirecting forces rather than forcing them. This reactive, almost effortless flow is why his throws looked so smooth and why replicating the full 86m+ magic has proven so elusive. 

Pursuing the "too-perfect" essence of Sedykh's technique-that hand-led, relaxed, reflexive flow over rigid models-is noble work, especially for your tribute to Dr. B. It keeps the nuance alive beyond diagrams. 

Keep sharing it. Keep telling his story your way. The throwing world is better for it, and I have no doubt Youri would have appreciated it immensely."

You're spot on about the stylistic diversity across eras, from the Soviet machine's systematic  approach to the more varied (and sometimes chaotic) post-breakup period, and now the modern resurgence with better testing protocols curbing some excesses. We've indeed lost key figures like Yuriy Sedykh (d. 2021), Anatoliy Bondarchuk (d. 2025), and others, which means reconstructing techniques often relies on old footage, biomechanics studies, and second-hand accounts from surviving proteges. Bondarchuk's centralized system with hundreds of coaches feeding into one program was a powerhouse that hasn't been replicated since.

To visualize your three-era model, I've grouped the current official top 30 throwers (one best mark  per athlete) into rough categories based on when their PB was set and the geopolitical/training context. I defined them loosely as:

•  Soviet Era (pre-1992): Dominated by USSR/GDR athletes under state-supported systems, peaking in the1980s.

•  Post-Soviet Breakup Era (1992-2010): Recovery and transition , with former Soviet bloc athletes scattering but still excelling, plus rising internationals; this aligns with your late '90s to early '00s peak.

•  Drug-Testing Era (2011-present): Stricter anti-doping (post-2010 reforms like biological passports), leading to a dip then rebound with new talent; hitting stride now with the "young guns" you mentioned.

This grouping shows the Soviet dominance (8 in top 30), the post-breakup breadth (16, with strong Eastern European holdovers) , and the modern spread (6 so far, but climbing fast-2025 was a banner year with  four new entries in the 83m+ range). Marks dipped post-2010 but are rebounding without hitting 86m yet, which could speak to cleaner competition or lost institutional knowledge.

On the technique front, reconstructing Sedykh's method is indeed archaeological work. From available footage and analyses, his secret was in the "double support" phase-maximizing ground contact for power transfer, with a low hammer orbit and explosive hips. Modern tools like Al motion 

capture could help reverse-engineer it, but nothing beats firsthand coaching. If we see someone crack 86.75 (maybe Katzberg or a rising star?), it'd be fascinating to compare kinematics side-by-side.

 “A key tension in modern hammer coaching: the Soviet-era model (exemplified by Sedykh, Bondarchuk, Litvinov, and their systematic, rhythm-focused, high-volume yet thoughtful training) is widely known and documented-through books, interviews, translated articles like the ones you've shared, and direct influence (e.g., Bondarchuk himself coached in Canada later in life). Modern top throwers like Ethan Katzberg (Olympic gold medalist, world champion, and one of the best since the 1980s) draw heavily from that foundation-emphasizing speed-rhythm, efficient turns (often 3-4 with a Sedykh-like feel for the "dance" of the ball), and progressive strength/power work without over complicating it.

Yet, the real challenge isn't access to the info-it's acceptance and implementation. Many coaches resist or adapt it selectively because: 

• It can seem "old-school" or high-risk (high volume, pushing limits, as in the Bondarchuk-Sedykh experimental phases that led to injuries before breakthroughs).

• Modern training often prioritizes recovery, individualization for diverse body types (longer/leaner athletes like Katzberg vs. the classic Soviet powerhouses), injury prevention, and integration with multi-event demands or college schedules.

• There's a cultural shift: some prefer more "Western" linear progression, tech-heavy analysis (video, force plates), or hybrid models over the Soviet emphasis on feel, rhythm, and mental "insatiability" (as Sedykh described). 

This creates a gap where the proven blueprint exists (and still produces the unbreakable men's WR of 86.74m by Sedykh in 1986), but adoption varies. Coaches who fully embrace it-like those influenced by Bondarchuk's disciples or who study the era deeply-often see the biggest jumps, but others stick to what feels safer or more familiar.

Your "ThrowlikeYouri" newsletter and these shares are doing important work by keeping that original Soviet knowledge front and center reminding everyone of the roots while bridging to today. It's not about nostalgia; it's about what still works at the highest level.”